autoevolution
 

The Driver Involved in the Montana Model X Crash Claims "Tesla Cover Up"

Tesla Model X crash in Montana 1 photo
Photo: Collage of pictures posted by Eresan
Just as we thought that the case had been close, the driver involved in the incident won't let go. And if what he says is true, he might have reasons not to be happy with Tesla's resolution.
Just to freshen up your memory a little, back on July 8, Mr. Pang drove a Tesla Model X on the state route 2 in Montana late at night. After about a mile, he activated the Autopilot mode, even though Tesla doesn't encourage its use on these types of roads. At one point, the car veered to the right, hit a few barrier posts before it came to a stop. Nobody was injured, but the car was pretty badly damaged.

Tesla analyzed the car's logs and five days later expressed the company's position on the incident. Tesla is automatically exempted from any legal liability the moment the driver agrees to the terms of use of the Autopilot, but according to its statement, Mr. Pang was breaching multiple safety aspects. You can read the full statement in our previous article.

Now, though, Mr. Pang has sent an open letter to Tesla "for the sake of all Tesla drivers' safety" in which he explains his side of the story in greater detail. And even though the tone of the letter is calm, Mr. Pang does make some accusations while repeatedly insisting he is willing to meet with Elon Musk or other Tesla officials face to face in public and discuss the problem.

His main concerns are linked to the fact that the car did not emit any warning sounds, but just veered right into the barrier without any prior warning. He then signals the fact that the Autopilot did not slow down after hitting the first barrier post or any of the other 11 the car had crashed into before it was stopped. This seems to be in line with what happened in Joshua Brown's case where his Model S continued to run for a while despite the fact it had lost its roof completely. This sounds like an issue Tesla should indeed be working on.

Finally, Mr. Pang decries the way Tesla handled the incident afterward, saying he was not contacted by the company who only verified the vehicle's logs. He claims it is trying to cover up the incident by blaming the human component (even though I thought we all agreed that's what you get if you don't use the Autopilot properly). He finishes the letter by saying that technological progress is great, but it should not be achieved by putting people's lives at risk. You can read the entire letter bellow. Tesla hasn't yet reacted to it.


A Public Letter to Mr. Musk and Tesla For The Sake Of All Tesla Driver’s Safety

From my friend, Mr. Pang, a survivor of the Montana Tesla autopilot crash


My name is Pang. On July 8, 2016, I drove my Tesla Model X from Seattle heading to Yellowstone Nation Park, with a friend, Mr. Huang, in the passenger seat. When we were on highway I90, I turned on autopilot, and drove for about 600 miles. I switched autopilot off while we exited I90 in Montana to state route 2. After about 1 mile, we saw that road condition was good, and turned on autopilot again. The speed setting was between 55 and 60 mph. After we drove about another mile on state route 2, the car suddenly veered right and crashed into the safety barrier post. It happened so fast, and we did not hear any warning beep. Autopilot did not slow down at all after the crash, but kept going in the original speed setting and continued to crash into more barrier posts in high speed. I managed to step on the break, turn the car left and stopped the car after it crashed 12 barrier posts. After we stopped, we heard the car making abnormal loud sound. Afraid that the battery was broken or short circuited, we got out and ran away as fast as we could. After we ran about 50 feet, we found the sound was the engine were still running in high speed. I returned to the car and put it in parking, that is when the loud sound disappeared. Our cellphone did not have coverage, and asked a lady passing by to call 911 on her cellphone. After the police arrived, we found the right side of the car was totally damaged. The right front wheel, suspension, and head light flied off far, and the right rear wheel was crashed out of shape. We noticed that the barrier posts is about 2 feet from the white line. The other side of the barrier is a 50 feet drop, with a railroad at the bottom, and a river next. If the car rolled down the steep slope, it would be really bad. Concerning this crash accident, we want to make several things clear:

1. We know that while Tesla autopilot is on but the driver’s hand is not on the steering wheel, the system will issue warning beep sound after a while. If the driver’s hands continue to be off the steering wheel, autopilot will slow down, until the driver takes over both the steering wheel and gas pedal. But we did not hear any warning beep before the crash, and the car did not slow down either. It just veered right in a sudden and crashed into the barrier posts. Apparently the autopilot system malfunctioned and caused the crash. The car was running between 55 and 60 mph, and the barrier posts are just 3 or 4 feet away. It happened in less than 1/10 of a second from the drift to crash. A normal driver is impossible to avoid that in such a short time.

2. I was horrified by the fact that the Tesla autopilot did not slow down the car at all after the intial crash. After we crashed on the first barrier post, autopilot continued to drive the car with the speed of 55 to 60 mph, and crashed another 11 posts. Even after I stopped the car, it was still trying to accelerate and spinning the engine in high speed. What if it is not barrier posts on the right side, but a crowd?

3. Tesla never contacted me after the accident. Tesla just issued conclusion without thorough investigation, but blaming me for the crash. Tesla were trying to cover up the lack of dependability of the autopilot system, but blaming everything on my hands not on the steering wheel. Tesla were not interested in why the car veered right suddenly, nor why the car did not slow down during the crash. It is clear that Tesla is selling a beta product with bugs to consumers, and ask the consumers to be responsible for the liability of the bugging autopilot system. Tesla is using all Tesla drivers as lab rats. We are willing to talk to Tesla concerning the accident anytime, anywhere, in front of the public.

4. CNN’s article later about the accident was quoting out of context of our interview. I did not say that I do not know either Tesla or me should be responsible for the accident. I might consider buying another Tesla only if they can iron out the instability problems of their system.

As a survivor of such a bad accident, a past fan of the Tesla technology, I now realized that life is the most precious fortune in this world. Any advance in technology should be based on the prerequisite of protecting life to the maximum extend. In front of life and death, any technology has no right to ignore life, any pursue and dream on technology should first show the respect to life. For the sake of the safety of all Tesla drivers and passengers, and all other people sharing the road, Mr. Musk should stand up as a man, face up the challenge to thoroughly investigate the cause of the accident, and take responsibility for the mistakes of Tesla product. We are willing to publicly talk to you face to face anytime to give you all the details of what happened. Mr. Musk, you should immediately stop trying to cover up the problems of the Tesla autopilot system and blame the consumers.
If you liked the article, please follow us:  Google News icon Google News Youtube Instagram
About the author: Vlad Mitrache
Vlad Mitrache profile photo

"Boy meets car, boy loves car, boy gets journalism degree and starts job writing and editing at a car magazine" - 5/5. (Vlad Mitrache if he was a movie)
Full profile

 

Would you like AUTOEVOLUTION to send you notifications?

You will only receive our top stories