autoevolution
 

IIHS Passenger-Side Small Overlap Front Crash Test Introduced with Mixed Results

Passenger-Side Small Overlap Front Crash Test 10 photos
Photo: IIHS
Passenger-Side Small Overlap Front Crash Test resultsPassenger-Side Small Overlap Front Crash TestPassenger-Side Small Overlap Front Crash TestPassenger-Side Small Overlap Front Crash TestVehicles with good driver-side protection may leave passengers at risk2015 Toyota RAV42015 Toyota RAV4 2015 Toyota RAV4 passenger-side small overlap crash test2015 Toyota RAV4 driver-side small overlap crash test2015 Toyota RAV4 passenger-side small overlap crash test
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is known for not playing around, crashing cars just for the hell of it. With the small overlap front test, the IIHS sends the vehicle into a barrier at 40 mpg with 25 percent of the front end overlapping the barrier on the driver’s side. And guess what? Some automakers took note of the “driver’s side” part, ignoring the passenger’s side.
Yours truly first reported about this matter in June 2016, when the Insurance Institute tested seven sport utility vehicles for passenger side crashworthiness. Briefly put, only the 2016 Hyundai Tucson earned the “good” rating, with the remainder of the test group evaluated as “acceptable,” “marginal,” and “poor.”

Now that the passenger-side impact has been introduced to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s testing protocol, you can bet that fewer automakers will try and save money by cutting corners in the crashworthiness department. And similarly to last year, the test group crashed on this occasion polarized the IIHS with mixed results. In total, 13 vehicles were crash-tested.

A “good” or “acceptable” passenger-side rating is required for a vehicle to qualify for the 2018 Top Safety Pick+ award, and reassuringly, 10 of the 13 vehicles tested were deemed “good” by the Insurance Institute’s safety boffins. These are the Ford Fusion, Honda Accord, Lincoln MKZ, Subaru Legacy, Subaru Outback, Hyundai Sonata, Mazda6, Nissan Altima, Nissan Maxima, and Toyota Camry.

In the “acceptable” corner, the soon-to-be-refreshed Volkswagen Jetta failed to impress. The biggest offenders from IIHS’ view, however, are the “marginal”- rated Volkswagen Passat and Chevrolet Malibu.

"The midsize cars we tested didn't have any glaring structural deficiencies on the right side," declared senior research engineer Becky Mueller. "Optimizing airbags and safety belts to provide better head protection for front-seat passengers appears to be the most urgent task now." That being the case, it will be interesting to see if automakers will pay attention to the IIHS’ tips.

If you liked the article, please follow us:  Google News icon Google News Youtube Instagram
About the author: Mircea Panait
Mircea Panait profile photo

After a 1:43 scale model of a Ferrari 250 GTO sparked Mircea's interest for cars when he was a kid, an early internship at Top Gear sealed his career path. He's most interested in muscle cars and American trucks, but he takes a passing interest in quirky kei cars as well.
Full profile

 

Would you like AUTOEVOLUTION to send you notifications?

You will only receive our top stories