autoevolution
 

Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 vs. Porsche 911 Carrera 2 Track Test Is a Tough Call

526 HP Mustang Shelby GT350 vs. 370 HP Porsche 911 Track Test 6 photos
Photo: YouTube screenshot
526 HP Mustang Shelby GT350 vs. 370 HP Porsche 911 Track Test526 HP Mustang Shelby GT350 vs. 370 HP Porsche 911 Track Test526 HP Mustang Shelby GT350 vs. 370 HP Porsche 911 Track Test526 HP Mustang Shelby GT350 vs. 370 HP Porsche 911 Track Test526 HP Mustang Shelby GT350 vs. 370 HP Porsche 911 Track Test
We have to admit that the track comparison we're here to show you might sound like a bit of an answer to a question nobody asked, at least at first.
We're dealing with a track battle involving a 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 and a 2016 Porsche 911 Carrera 2. So why would the second most potent pony in the Mustang line-up face the entry-level Neunelfer?

Well, for one thing, back in 2015 when we talked to Ford Performance chief engineer Dave Pericak about the matter, the Blue Oval man told us to expect the GT350(R) to be better than the... GT3. However, while the Ford Performance boss was talking about the 997 generation of the Neunelfer, we're here to discuss the mid-cycle revamp of the 991 rear-engined coupe.

The two are compared on Canada's Calabogie Motorsports Park (Ontario), with the battle coming from the full-time aficionados over at Driving.ca.

We won't waste your time with dropping any figures here, nor will we spoil the fun of the footage by telling you what's going on in the clip.

Instead, there's one last thing we need to mention before inviting you to reach for the "play" button below.

Interestingly, both the Porsche 911 and the Ford Mustang have been reinvented for their current generations. For the Ford, the switch to the independent rear suspension (IRS) was a major leap, one that allows the Blue Oval machine to turn into a fierce animal on the track.

As for the rear-engined coupe, one of the ways in which Zuffenhausen compensated for the purity and soundtrack loss brought by the now-turbocharged line-up was to seriously up the ante on the performance level.

So, despite the two test we have here cars being separated by a whopping $40,000 gap, it's safe to say that we're dealing with one hell of a double refresh.

If you liked the article, please follow us:  Google News icon Google News Youtube Instagram
About the author: Andrei Tutu
Andrei Tutu profile photo

In his quest to bring you the most impressive automotive creations, Andrei relies on learning as a superpower. There's quite a bit of room in the garage that is this aficionado's heart, so factory-condition classics and widebody contraptions with turbos poking through the hood can peacefully coexist.
Full profile

 

Would you like AUTOEVOLUTION to send you notifications?

You will only receive our top stories