Autonomous cars appear to be around the corner, if we look at some of the players in the industry, but not all parties agree that driverless vehicles are ready to replace humans.
Herman Herman, a roboticist and commercialization specialist from Carnegie Mellon University’s Robotics Laboratory, currently the director of the facility, thinks that we are long away from autonomous vehicles. Herman has been leading the robotics lab since February 23, 2015, after 40 of its 100 scientists were hired by Uber.
At the time, Uber had a partnership with the Robotics Lab at Carnegie Mellon University, but the ride-sharing giant preferred to hire the specialists it was working with and set up a center in Pittsburgh to deal with self-driving car development. That is the reason why the company will first test autonomous Volvo XC90 SUVs on the streets of that city, and not someplace else.
According to Herman Herman, there is a good reason why Uber will have engineers behind the wheel of its autonomous driving prototypes. Instead of just having a “safety net,” Herman states that the current condition of the technology that means to deliver driverless vehicles is “not even close” to its stated goal.
From a technical perspective, Herman told Vice that he is not sure whether Uber’s technology is ready for self-driving operation. Instead, he believes that the company said otherwise because it needed the marketing praise that goes with driverless vehicle technology. Other non-technical reasons were also involved.
The most important statement in Herman’s interview with Vice’s Motherboard is that it is “easy” to achieve 80% of the development for a driverless vehicle, which consists of operating in areas with excellent weather, good GPS, and proper road markings.
However, the real problem is to attain the rest of the development process, which requires making a car that can drive itself when there is no GPS, inclement weather, unmarked roads, and even all of the above.
While humans have a shot at achieving this and driving in such situations as the one described above, driverless cars of today cannot perform such actions.
That is why the vehicles tested in California performed so well - all they had to endure was bright sunlight or rain. From that point of view, we believe Mr. Herman is right when he says it is a crucial obstacle that needs to be resolved.
At the time, Uber had a partnership with the Robotics Lab at Carnegie Mellon University, but the ride-sharing giant preferred to hire the specialists it was working with and set up a center in Pittsburgh to deal with self-driving car development. That is the reason why the company will first test autonomous Volvo XC90 SUVs on the streets of that city, and not someplace else.
According to Herman Herman, there is a good reason why Uber will have engineers behind the wheel of its autonomous driving prototypes. Instead of just having a “safety net,” Herman states that the current condition of the technology that means to deliver driverless vehicles is “not even close” to its stated goal.
From a technical perspective, Herman told Vice that he is not sure whether Uber’s technology is ready for self-driving operation. Instead, he believes that the company said otherwise because it needed the marketing praise that goes with driverless vehicle technology. Other non-technical reasons were also involved.
The most important statement in Herman’s interview with Vice’s Motherboard is that it is “easy” to achieve 80% of the development for a driverless vehicle, which consists of operating in areas with excellent weather, good GPS, and proper road markings.
However, the real problem is to attain the rest of the development process, which requires making a car that can drive itself when there is no GPS, inclement weather, unmarked roads, and even all of the above.
While humans have a shot at achieving this and driving in such situations as the one described above, driverless cars of today cannot perform such actions.
That is why the vehicles tested in California performed so well - all they had to endure was bright sunlight or rain. From that point of view, we believe Mr. Herman is right when he says it is a crucial obstacle that needs to be resolved.