Toyota Camry or Honda Accord, which mid-sized sedan would be the better choice? There is no straightforward answer, as a relatively sophisticated algorithm is needed to compile and issue a resolution. Everyone who bought a car had to adjust several variables. From price to primary use to usage and maintenance costs to make, model, and color, the list could fill a nice portion of the internet.
But we narrowed it down to these two contenders: both from Japan, mid-sized sedans, and comparable price ranges. And, while choosing between two items is incommensurably easier than settling upon the brands themselves, we are still looking at a long debate before making our pick.
Fortunately, 2023 is closing in faster and faster, and technology is everywhere, ready to make our lives simpler, more accessible, longer, and happier. Or so we intend when we develop, build, and put a new form of some live-improving contraption into general use.
In recent years, we have seen how the rising popularity of Artificial Intelligence is propelling it into broader fields of our everyday existence. And, since we are the only species in the galaxy that uses automobiles, it only comes naturally that this marvelous invention of humanity benefited from the majestic cyber intellect implant.
We have cars that drive themselves, park themselves, and talk to us. But how about putting AI to another form of trial-by-automobile: instead of asking an all-too-knowledgeable computer to design, build, and use an automobile, why don’t we ask its advice on a somewhat human matter: suggest a purchase decision?
Photo: Honda
So, we turned to our newly discovered buddy from the ream of binary logic, ChatGPT, and shot a simple question at its alphanumeric brain: Honda Accord or Toyota Camry? Granted, the question is not easy to answer for any of us, nor is the decision (based on calculated factors, and not just draw-stick made).
The dialogue-apt chatbot suggested we go for a test drive first. Caution is a human trait, and it seems like Artificial Intelligence learns to recognize its subtle nuances. It didn’t offer a downright answer, Honda or Toyota. It did what a person would do – it underlined several base indicators to help us make an educated pick. But it sounds as if it would rather have the Accord if AI were to morph into a robot and go for a ride.
In all honesty, the cyber sales counselor leans toward the rational choice-making mechanism, as the answer implies. “When it comes to choosing between the Honda Accord and the Toyota Camry, it ultimately comes down to personal preference. Bot cars are popular sedans known for their reliability, comfort, and value.”
Frankly, this is just what a husband would tell his lady when discussing a car acquisition – pragmatic reasons, factual utility, and analytical elements. Emotional considerations are out of the question (and of the answer) for the ChatGPT. It’s a machine that learns specific behavioral patterns; it can’t comprehend highly complex equations.
Photo: Toyota
Such as: “I don’t like the color” (either in general, or it can be something hidden, like the stitching thread hue. Or the gas cap release button). Or – I probably speak for a lot of us when I say this – the debate-ending argumentation: “I don’t like it” (just by glazing over a photo on the phone). “Why? It’s this and that, new, practical, economical, and so on.” “I don’t like it.” (This author has had several – please read “many” – instances of this occurrence). This is where all the artificial intelligence in the universe would run out of reasoning (just as non-artificial intelligence often does).
The AI chatbot dug deeper and added: “The Accord has a reputation for being sportier and more engaging to drive, while the Camry is known for its smooth, refined side. It’s a good idea to test drive both cars and see which one you like better.” (Maybe there is a Mrs. ChatGPT, after all…)
“Additionally, it’s worth considering factors such as fuel efficiency, interior space, and available features when making your decision.” Well, the AI advisor convinced me that my thinking pattern has the computerized blessing to go ahead and do all of the above. But it fails spectacularly in providing a safe haven for when the really hard questions arrive. Technology is still young, but something tells me it will never mature enough to offer solutions to specific everyday challenges. In the meantime, watch the video - natural intelligence compares the cars and points out the pros and cons.
After nearly two decades in news television, Răzvan turned to a different medium. He’s been a field journalist, a TV producer, and a seafarer but found that he feels right at home among petrolheads. Full profile
Would you like AUTOEVOLUTION to send you notifications?
Google News