I, Robot. Brought to You by Toyotaaaa!... ... Over the years I've owned a number of cars. For example, a couple of years ago I was the unhappy owner of a Mercedes-Benz ML. It was the latest model then, but some time had passed since the generation's launch so I told myself it would be bug-free, just the ... Continue reading >
LATEST LOG ENTRIES:
QUICK STATS:
Test Drive: PORSCHE Panamera S - 2009
- PHOTO GALLERY
- INTRO / HISTORY / BRAND
- EXTERIOR
- INTERIOR
- IN THE CITY
- OPEN ROAD
- COMFORT
- TECH FACTS
- GADGETS
- SAFETY
- CONCLUSIONS
- GUEST EDITOR OPINIONS
INTRO / HISTORY / BRAND 9/10
The Panamera isn't Porsche's first attempt at straying away from the 911-range with a totally atypical model. It might not even be one of its most disastrous. On the contrary, considering the market today. For example, starting from the 1970s, Porsche has tried to either draw attention from or complement the 911 with cars like the 914, 924/944, 928, Boxster/Cayman and of course, the Cayenne. So far, the most atypical of them all, the Cayenne, has actually proved to also be the best-seller of the bunch.
The Panamera isn't Porsche's first attempt at making a fast and luxurious grand tourer either, since the ill-fated 928 took the cake for that one. Coincidentally, the 928 also had four bucket seats and a V8 engine disposed in the front, while the GTS version was smoking fast as well.
You'll probably laugh, but the Panamera doesn't win the prize for the first Porsche sedan either. Back in 1988, when Aston Martin's current CEO Urlich Bez was at the helm of Porsche engineering, a strange idea popped into his head. It may have sounded something like: “How about ve make a four-door 911, ja? A car mit 911 looks, 911 performance und four seats, vhat do you say guys?”
Apparently everybody said yes, and remember, this was in a time when the 928 grand tourer was having a blast in sales worldwide. A prototype called “989” was built. Sadly, just in a matter of a couple of years the 928 sales plummeted, Porsche entered some financial doo doo and Mr Bez left the company, so the project for a four-door 911 was scrapped. Coincidentally (or not), Ulrich Bez has now brought the Aston Martin Rapide straight into Panamera territory.
Twenty-something years later, the four-door 911/luxurious grand touring sedan was revived from the dead and the Panamera was born. Some like it, some don't, but the real questions revolve more around its handling, performance and comfort than its looks. We say this because at least 50% of the international motoring press has already lambasted the car's styling.
We managed to borrow a Panamera S with PDK and rear-wheel drive for us to test and give our opinion about. To see if we were impressed in either a good or a bad way, you might as well read on and find out. Is this a four-wheeled masterpiece or a rotten apple in the Porsche orchard?
VISUAL IMPACT (EXTERIOR) 7/10
Technically, designing a foor-door version of a Porsche 911 shouldn't be all that hard, especially when we're talking about a “foor-door coupe” à la Mercedes-Benz CLS or Aston Martin Rapide, right? Wrong. Given that Porsche didn't just want a longer version of the 911 but a regular gran tourer with more than two doors. That, they got.
Read more >>
They also wanted a car which can be acknowledged as a Porsche from miles away, not just from the badge. They got that also. When all were said and done – as in all the prerequisites for a “four-door grand tourer that looks like a Porsche” had been met – the Panamera was given the green light.
About a year before its official unveiling though, the increasing number of spy-shots began to reveal something that looked more and more like an abomination on wheels. With a lateral line that looked more like a flattened Cayenne than a graceful Mercedes-Benz CLS or Aston Martin Rapide, the Panamera began to attract quite a lot of negative reviews about its styling even before its official launch.
Honestly, the car doesn't look half-bad in the flesh, to us at least. The Porsche DNA can be seen and felt all around the car. Two frog-eye-looking headlights that sit a bit higher than the hood, beetle-looking side and a rear which could very well belong to a large 911.
Where did they go wrong in the “vox populis” area then? Well, for one thing, unlike on the 911, the engine doesn't sit in the rear but in the front, thing which kind of ruins the 911(ish) proportions. Secondly, since the Porsche wanted the Panamera to provide more than ample space for four adults inside, the roof line isn't as raked as on its competitors. This pretty much transforms the side view from looking like a four-door coupe to something that resembles a weird hatchback that has been stepped on by Godzilla.
Also, the oversized taillights don't actually help the way it looks from the rear. All in all, the general opinion on the Panamera's exterior design is pretty mixed, so we can't give it a very good mark. Most of us here like it, but only if we take it as it is. If we put it against its major competitors it would most definitely lose from the elegance point of view though.
DEEP IMPACT (INTERIOR) 8/10
Whatever critics could be made about the Panamera's exterior, every one of them should be silenced when talking about its interior. Some of us could actually classify it as a work of art, and remember we're not talking about a fully decked-out Panamera Turbo here, but about a lower-trimmed Panamera S.
The interior was designed from the start with the idea of giving pretty much the same personal space to each one of its occupants. Did we say space? We also meant options and gadgets. Apart from the obvious bits like steering wheel and pedals, the passenger from the front pretty much benefits from the same amenities as the driver himself.
Sadly, our test car wasn't equipped with none of the highly-touted four-zone automatic climate control, the top of the line Burmester audio system, or the rear-seat entertainment system. This means that the rear passengers could only share the same amount of space as the ones in the front, thanks to the individual rear seats.
Speaking of which (interior space, ed), there is absolutely no way for someone to feel claustrophobic inside a Panamera. The space available is more than enough in all directions, even for taller passengers, though the Panamera is quite a bit lower than your average luxury sedan. We can't say the same for the luggage compartment, which doesn't excel nor does it disappoint at 445 liters (15.7 cubic feet). Thanks to the rear hatch the trunk is more accessible than your average sedan though.
All in all, the quality of the materials used and the fit and finish are as close to “top notch” as possible, starting from the softness of the leather trim to the aluminium and wood inserts on the dashboard. The only thing not of modern Porsche quality inside were probably the control knobs for the cruise control, the signals and the windshield wipers, but those stay out of sight most of the time thanks to the steering wheel.
IN THE CITY 4/10
Driving such a large behemoth on a congested city's streets can obviously become a pain pretty fast. It's not about the length of the car, which at 4970 mm (185.7 inches) is a bit lower than that of an S-Klasse for example, but about the width. The Panamera is almost two meters (about 79 inches) wide, making it pretty hard to squeeze between other cars in busy traffic. The poor visibility “thanks” to the rather small windows and rear windshield doesn't help either.
Read more >>
On top of it all, the “squashed beetle” look makes it harder for the driver to approximate the actual size of the car from inside, since all the vehicle's “corners” are hidden from his view. OK, enough with the bad-mouthing, what about the Panamera's high points?
Well, for one thing, parking is made quite easy for such a large car with poor visibility. Our test car was equipped with an army of front and rear parking sensors, while the decently-sized exterior rear view mirrors took care of the rest. If that's not enough to calm the spirits, you should learn that Porsche is also offering a rear-view camera as an option.
Fuel consumption, you ask? Hmm, we could go on about how high it is, but when you stop and take into account the fact that the Panamera S is a 400 horsepower luxo-barge that weighs 1875 kilograms (4133 pounds) without any passengers on board, things tend to change a little bit. During the short stint we had with the car in the city we averaged 19.6 liters per 100 kilometers (US 12 mpg).
Compared to the official 16 liters per 100 kilometers (US 14.7 mpg) it doesn't sound so bad, does it? Especially when thinking that we didn't actually “caress” the accelerator, while the standard “automatic stop start” system was switched off the whole time. By the way, it's the first automatic transmission-equipped car in the world which utilizes this system.
Another downside could be represented by the rather low ground clearance, which could make you scrape some of the undercarriage when entering/exiting underground garages. All in all, if you can get accustomed with the rather poor visibility (especially in the rear) and the fact that it's as wide as a truck, the Panamera can be used in the city just fine.
OPEN ROAD 9/10
After our short stroll through the city we tested the Panamera S on its true turf: the open road. This is where the magic happens with a car like this. The 4.8-liter V8 using as much of its 400 horsepower as possible, the seven-speed double-clutch PDK transmission in sport (or manual) mode and a clear, police-free road. What more could you want? And to think that all this is now available for up to four whole passengers, unlike a maximum of two and a couple of midgets in a 911.
Read more >>
Still, it was not all fun and games though, since a couple of nuisances marred our drive. First of all, despite activating the stiffer mode for the standard electronically-controlled dampers (our test car wasn't equipped with the optional adaptive air suspension or the dynamic chassis control) the car didn't exactly behave like an all-out sports car on slightly bumpy roads. It actually gave a feeling of instability and a “floating” sensation over road imperfections at higher speeds.
After judging it a bit negatively we were reminded of the fact that the PASM (Porsche Active Suspension Management) can actually switch from Sport to Normal or Comfort on its own if it detects that you're driving on a not-so-smooth surface, despite the “Sport” mode being activated. The fuel consumption, if anybody would care, was situated around the 8-10 liters per 100 km mark (US 23.5-29.4 mpg) during a decent cruising speed, but for the heavy-right footers out there it can rise to over 14 liters per 100 km (US 16.8 mpg) or even more.
Our test car's pretty obvious tendency to go a bit sideways whenever a full-throttle launch was made is proof that this isn't exactly the right vehicle for a normal luxo-barge driver or a person who likes to be driven by a chauffeur. No less than 400 horsepower and a massive 500 Newton Meters (368.8 lb ft) of torque can catapult the leviathan from naught to 100 kilometers per our (62 mph) in a minimum of 5.4 seconds. After that it can go to an aerodynamic-limited top speed of 283 km/h (176 mph). Not a bad feat considering its sheer size and weight.
The steering is as precise as it gets while the braking system – without benefiting from the optional ceramic discs – is also deep down in Porsche territory (translation: horrifyingly good, especially for a beginner). All in all, even in its natural-aspirated V8 form and rear-wheel drive, the Porsche Panamera S is one hell of a sports grand tourer.
FEED ME LIES (COMFORT) 9/10
Beside the Cayenne, the Panamera is probably the most comfortable Porsche in the history of... Porsches to ever roam the streets. We're not only talking about the suspension setup alone but about the whole package. Even though as we mentioned before our test car wasn't equipped with the optional adaptive air suspension, all Panameras come with electronically-controlled dampers (PASM) in standard.
In other words, the driver can choose between three separate damping modes, depending on his mood and, of course, driving style. Although “Sport”, “Normal” and “Comfort” modes are available, the system continuously monitors the road conditions and automatically switches to the right mode if necessary. The cute thing about it is that it switches back to the one the driver has chosen as soon as the road conditions and driving style allow it.
For example, if you switch it to “Comfort” but after a while you start driving like you're on a fast lap on the Nurburgring the system will automatically switch to “Sport” mode. The opposite thing will happen if you're in “Sport” mode and the road transforms from smooth silk to a paved nightmare for your kidneys. Fancy stuff!
As far as the seating goes, the Panamera is close to perfection. There is no way that a longer trip will tire its passengers no matter the road conditions. Our colleagues from Inside Line even managed to put one of their videographers to sleep (not in the veterinary sense) while cruising at over 150 mph on the Autobahn. If that doesn't mean comfortable to you, we don't know what does.
DEUS EX MACHINA (TECH FACTS) 8/10
As far as the technical bits are concerned, and as you probably might expect, the Panamera S doesn't sit half bad. Under the long and curved hood sits a naturally-aspirated V8 with a capacity of 4.8 liters. With 400 horsepower and 500 Newton Meters (368.8 lb ft) of torque available on tap from 3500 all the way to 5000 rpm, the engine is almost never short of breath, even when it has to pull (push?) something that weighs close to two tonnes.
Another impressive piece of engineering that we never got tired of was the seven-speed PDK (which comes from the unpronounceable Porsche Doppelkupplungsgetriebe) double-clutch transmission. Everything from the gaming-like shift times to the way it chooses the perfect gear depending on the driving circumstance is simply amazing.
To give it some bad remarks though, the PDK we experienced in the Porsche Cayman S test drive was a bit more “fierce” than this one, probably due to different programming of the ECU. For example, in the Panamera S the only gear the car will start in is second, unless the “Sport” mode is activated.
Considering that a pedal-to-the-metal start in “Sport” mode will keep the anti skidding system on the go for a good three or four seconds despite the dryness of the driving surface, the “second gear” start in normal mode might not be such a bad idea. Plus, the Panamera S sends all its power to the rear wheels so the anti-skid system is much busier than in the 4 S or the Turbo, both of which had all-wheel drive.
The electronically controlled suspension is another nice feat on a car as this, especially since it's available in standard trim.
USEFUL TOYS (GADGETS) 7/10
Arriving at the gadgets department, no car costing a bit more than 100,000 euros should fail at delivering, should it? Well, as you might have probably thought already, the Porsche Panamera we got to test didn't disappoint at this chapter. We already talked you through the marvelous PDK twin-clutch transmission with seven speeds, but we must say it probably remains our favorite gadget in this car. The engine provided its own reasons for liking also, but we can't help but be amazed every time we experience an automatic gearbox as great as this.
Though our test car was far from being fully-decked with features it provided quite a nice array of gadgets. For example, it wasn't fitted with the four-zone automatic climate control system, but the dual-zone it had was more than effective and its features were equally available to both the driver and the passenger sitting in the front. The Bose audio system was not quite in the optional Burmester territory, but still far better than your average hi-fi in-car audio system.
Moreover, the cruise control system – albeit with a lever looking like it had been transplanted from a cheap econobox – was another nice addition, along with the High Intensity Discharge headlights with a light sensor. Speaking of which, apart form the rain sensor our car also had sensors monitoring both the road condition and the driving style, continuously changing the way the dampers work.
The heated front seats did a nice job complementing the air conditioning unit, but a ventilation feature à la the Porsche Cayman S we tested before was missing (still on the options list though). The only real gripe we had in the car's gadgets department was a pretty weird one actually. Believe it or not, the Panamera S we tested was lacking a wiper for the rear windshield. Don't fret though, that feature is also available on the options list.
ON THE SAFE SIDE (SAFETY) 9/10
Apart from being such a large and heavy – therefore less prone to exit more traumatized from a frontal car crash – the Porsche Panamera comes with quite an impressive array of safety features in standard. Of course, it will probably never be tested at EuroNCAP or other crash testing organization, so we can only estimate how good (or bad) it would handle in a crash.
First of all, no less than eight standard airbags were scattered around the interior. Two frontal dual-stage airbags, two knee airbags (world's first), two side airbags for protecting the thorax and pelvic regions and last but not least two head-protecting curtain airbags which go from the front to the rear of the interior.
Second of all, the active safety features present are probably enough to keep the Panamera out of most accident situations, so that the passive safety features shouldn't even deploy. Apart from the anti-lock braking system, there's the Porsche Stability Management (PSM), which includes an automatic brake differential (ABD), anti-slip regulation (ASR) and engine drag torque control (MSR).
Still, don't feel safe? Well, there's not much else we can tell you besides the fact that the Panamera also has a rollover sensor like only some premium SUVs do. Pedestrians shouldn't fear this car at lower speeds either. Why is that? Well, the Panamera is also equipped with a pyrotechnically-assisted system that raises the rear portion of the engine hood in the event of a crash, which can help to reduce the risk of injury to any unfortunate individual to be run over by the car...
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY (CONCLUSIONS) 9/10
Unlike what we were expecting, the Panamera S is more than just a four-door version of the 911. It uses its own platform, the engine sits in the front and it's not a Boxer but a V8. On top of that, the comfort features, interior space and level of performance make it a pretty fierce competitor for the Mercedes-Benz CLS 63 AMG, the Maserati Quattroporte or the Aston Martin Rapide. This is a true four-door grand tourer even in its lower-spec V8 and rear-wheel drive guise.
The fact that it's not exactly in the same league as the aforementioned competitors when it comes to styling might be a problem for some potential customers. We didn't exactly find it butt-ugly, but it sure can't stand a chance against the elegance of a CLS or a Rapide. Apparently the engineers in charge of the Panamera project were paid much, MUCH more than the stylists.
The ugly bit about the Panamera S we tested was probably the oddity of the options list. We mean, our test car had a seven-speed double-clutch transmission with an integrated start-stop system, cruise control, electronically-controlled suspension and other gizmos like that, but it didn't came equipped with a rear windshield wiper. Considering the car is actually a hatchback and the fact that not even the Panamera Turbo comes with that option in standard, this seems to be a bit weird.
GUEST STAR EDITORS' OPINIONS AND RATINGS
![]() | Sir May B. Bach strongly believes this car is worthy of a rating of 8 / 10 "Heh... what can I say? They've finally done it. Porsche has finally built a car for someone like... ahem... me. Luxurious, stupid-fast, spacious, etcetera... ahem... etcetera. But wait! Something's wrong here... They also hired a designer with a pretentious but unusual crush on the Galapagos... ahem... turtles. And they made him draw the best Porsche GT in years!" Read more >> |
![]() | Lou Cheeka knocked, knocked some more and finally shouted a rating of 7 / 10 "Dayumn! This is probably the flattest Porsche Cayenne I've ever seen! Who did the roof-choppin', West Coast Customs? It looks like a hot-rod made out of a Cayenne, fo shizzle! I gotta say I'm actually impressed by the way it looks. Wide, low and angry, just like any hot-rod should." Read more >> |
![]() | Mary broke a nail, complained a bit and then gave a rating of 4 / 10 "A lady never reveals her true age, don't you agree? Also, a gentleman should never guess it in public, especially if she's around the big 3 0. Leaving that aside, do I look a day over 23 years old to you? I though so. Then why, of all the Porsches that exist in the world, did you made me drive one that simply screams: I'm an old frigid business woman with too much testosterone to actually keep a man near me?" Read more >> |











24.11.2009 | 20:21 GMT
very nice for a family
26.11.2009 | 08:26 GMT
I used to consider that Cayenne is ugly. Not anymore: this one takes the cake. If Panamera were a person from the Middle Ages, the peasants would have killed her with stones, just because is so annoying. Look at that butt: is so big that it makes me tell "Yo' mama is so fat" jokes. This is the problem with Porsche: when thinking outside the box, it makes crappy cars. At least, from de design point of view. First Cayenne, now this "four-door saloon". What's next? Some competition for BMW X6? If that will happen, please prepare a rating scale with negative numbers. For now, just 15 for Panamera. And that because am in a good mood today.
28.11.2009 | 07:27 GMT
i completely agree with 12Guns.....porsche has seriously lost it...they should consider some actually all new designs
28.11.2009 | 15:02 GMT
this car is worth a billion dollars.
30.11.2009 | 00:27 GMT
best car ever!
01.12.2009 | 17:00 GMT
awesome car to drive, ride on your dreams, I am not so lucky.
11.12.2009 | 03:52 GMT
i like the exterior - all the complaints about the exterior are opposite to my own - it is a hatchback so it needs to look more like one, and the harsh sidelines akin to volvo's own hothatch entry take away from hatchback elegance.
i would kno because i <3 my R32 - which is why this porsche gets a C-/D+ grade. my R32 is way more clean but def mean, good looks and sound all around. the interior is nice no doubt, but it's similar to my own. the porsche just has more buttons and heavy wood. i think i've the same cruise control, wiper, signal arms and the same lights-on switch!
and in so far as technology is concerned i'm rockin' a similar setup but i have an extra 2-wheel advantage having 4MOTION. a lux ride like this should come with porsche's awd at least as an option.
22.12.2009 | 07:23 GMT
best ever
07.01.2010 | 20:39 GMT
well about the electrical part ... u can't do a 5 star job when u are payed with 150 euro/month ... just burn in hell with this model :)))))))))