Are Modern Car Seats Too Firm?... ... I might be called a weirdo after this article, but as the comments here might already suggest, I'm more than OK with getting flamed for exposing my opinion. So, here it goes. Am I the only one who thinks that nowadays most car manufacturers are pretty clueless ... Continue reading >
LATEST LOG ENTRIES:
QUICK STATS:
Test Drive: KIA Cee'd 1.4 Face Lift - 2009
- INTRO / HISTORY / BRAND
- EXTERIOR
- INTERIOR
- IN THE CITY
- OPEN ROAD
- COMFORT
- TECH FACTS
- GADGETS
- SAFETY
- CONCLUSIONS
INTRO / HISTORY / BRAND 6/10
The Kia Cee'd recently had its first facelift. For a car launched just under two years ago, this may seem like Kia has rushed things a bit, especially since even in the fast-paced happenings of today's automotive world, a mid-cycle facelift usually comes after three or four years of continuous production.
Well, not many people know that things happen differently in Korea, where the distinction between a mid-cycle facelift and a totally new generation of a car model is so thin you could pass one for another and vice versa. In other words, albeit this may seem just a small nip and tuck on the front and a new design for the taillights it's actually a bit more.
A few months ago we got the chance to drive and give our opinion about a non-facelifted Cee'd equipped with the 1.6 gasoline engine. After arriving at a semi-optimistic conclusion about it we all agreed that this might, for the first time, be the little Korean car that could. That could what, you ask? That could actually be the thorn in Volkswagen Golf's spine, some people say.
Well, although the car left us with a very good impression, it became apparent that a few glitches shouldn't have been present in order for it to actually fight with the Golf "mano a mano". Believe it or not, as if Kia engineers had listened to our complaints in the first test, this early-facelift pretty much covered what was wrong with the Cee'd in the first place.
While the upgraded exterior design is obviously the first thing you notice upon seeing the new model, it's actually the inside bits which left the biggest impression. And no, we're not talking about the car's interior, but about the technical, untouchable, bits. Read on to find out what we actually thought about the revised version of the Kia Cee'd.
VISUAL IMPACT (EXTERIOR) 6/10
Seen from the distance, there's not much to be said about this early facelift. As we mentioned on our previous Kia test drive with the pre-facelift version of the Cee'd, the car continues to follow a very clean and understated design. There are some changes though, but things only become truly apparent after you get closer.
Read more >>
For one thing, the headlights no longer make you think about the Mercedes S-Klasse, since their overall shape is almost entirely different now. They're much pointier, and the general layout brings them more in tone with the new Kia design language. Also, they're now framing a different front grill, one which has apparently brought only bad attention upon itself.
We don't know exactly how, but the addition of chrome can actually cheapen a car's look, not improve it. Such is the case with the Kia Cee'd facelift, at least according to most of the opinions we received on the street about the new grill.
The updated front bumper is pretty much in tune with the new headlights, so it's much more sculptured, integrating two trapezoidal fog lights. The side view on the other hand is identical to the old model, making it pretty difficult to distinguish it as an entirely different model for the casual onlooker. The only difference resides in the reshaped rear-view mirrors.
Along with the frontal area, the rear is the most different in terms of styling. The vertigo-like design of the taillights is now gone, having been replaced with more square-like lines, in tone with the rest of the car's revamped design.
All in all, apart maybe from the new chrome inlay on the front grill, the Kia Cee'd facelift doesn't bring a lot of things to the design table, but it sure makes the car look a lot more modern, or at least contemporary.
DEEP IMPACT (INTERIOR) 5/10
Unlike the exterior, the Cee'd's interior doesn't benefit from the same amount of novelty. That's not to say that it's identical to the previous one, of course. For one thing, the steering wheel has been replaced with a completely different-shaped one. The result is rather nice, we should say, since the new one not only looks better but it also feels better thanks to the better grip.
The steering controls for the audio system and the on-board computer are in a totally new arrangement now, with the "trip" button oddly residing on the lower part of the steering wheel. The center console on the other hand is quasi-identical to the old version, the only modifications being rather minor and only of cosmetic nature.
For example, the audio system buttons have been reshaped, while the slightly revamped climate controls seem more modern, especially since it now offers dual-zone air conditioning. Also, the interior lighting for the buttons and knobs is now red instead of orange. Other than the aforementioned and new upholstery for the seats everything is pretty much the same.
Just like its predecessor, the Cee'd facelift offers one of the most spacious cabins in its class, with enough room for four or even five people. The luggage compartment of course remains the same, with 340 liters (12 cubic feet) of space available for short and medium trips.
The overall fit and finish it provides does not surprise either, with materials far better than your average Korean econobox and the expected feeling of cheapness missing from most of the interior. The only low point was the under-par feel of the cloth upholstery and the hard plastic bits from the doors. Other than that, the Kia Cee'd facelift remains one of the best bag for bucks in its class, interior-wise as well.
IN THE CITY 5/10
In a totally surprising fashion and completely unlike the engine we tested on the other occasion, the little 1.4-liter four cylinder we drove now was very different in the way it behaved, especially compared with the official numbers. To make things clearer, if we only look at the specification sheet, this is an "upgraded" engine.
Read more >>
On the non-facelift model, the very same engine offers no less than 109 horsepower, mainly thanks to a highly-efficient Continuous Variable Valve Timing (CVVT) system. Obvious advantage – power. Main disadvantage – high fuel consumption.
Apparently, the high power versus displacement ratio didn't win too many hearts so Kia decided to "upgrade" it. The result? It now offers only 90 horsepower "thanks" to some tinkering of the ECU. While this might look as a step taken backwards at first glance, the "new" engine continues to provide a similar level of performance, but the average fuel consumption has dropped.
During our city driving session we managed to achieve an average fuel economy of about 9.5 liters per 100 kilometers (US 24.8 mpg). Pretty far from the official 7.2 liters per 100 km (US 32.7 mpg), but then again, we drove it through extremely busy traffic and the car had only... 12 kilometers (about 7 miles) on board when we first took it from the dealer.
The ECU-remapping must have done something to the torque curve as well, since we found the little 1.4 to actually behave better than its 1.6-liter brother at lower revs in the city. The noise levels were also dramatically decreased compared to what we had driven before in the non-facelift 1.6.
As far as visibility goes, nothing has really changed from the non-revised version of the Cee'd, with one small difference. The exterior rear-view mirrors have been reshaped, but the overall area of the mirror has been left alone, so almost no changes there either.
OPEN ROAD 4/10
Since the city driving part of our test drive changed our perception about the revised engine for the better, we were expecting similar results in the "Open Road" category also. Turns out we were a bit mislead by the previous numbers, because the minute we arrived on the highway it became apparent that 90 horsepower are, after all... only 90 horsepower.
Read more >>
The rather long ratios of the transmission, though good for fuel economy, aren't exactly a best friend of acceleration. The 13 seconds necessary from zero to 100 kilometers per hour (62 mph) don't seem that slow on paper, especially for a car with 90 horsepower and a minimum weight of over 1350 kilograms (about 2980 pounds) including driver. In reality though, the sprint from 90 km/h (56 mph) to 120 km/h (75 mph) seems to take ages and the car struggles to reach higher cruising speeds, regardles of what gear you're in.
OK, so these were the car's "Open Road" downsides, but what about its good points? Well, for one thing, this facelift brings improved sound cushioning, so the interior noise levels are far better than in the old Cee'd.
If that's not enough we must tell you that we were absolutely flabbergasted of the difference in handling, considering we didn't read a single Korean marketing mumbo-jumbo about improvements to the suspension. We can now honestly say that we found the Cee'd facelift to have similar, if not even better in some areas, handling than what most people consider the standard in this class, the Volkswagen Golf.
Sporty and responsive when "given' the whip" on back roads, while keeping the above-average level of comfort at high levels. We suspect the main difference in the car's handling comes from the improved gas-shocks, by the way. Also, the steering seemed a bit more precise, but that may be just a placebo effect thanks to the sportier-shaped and thicker steering wheel.
As far as the fuel consumption, we averaged around 6 liters per 100 kilometers (US 39.2 mpg) – not that far from the official 5.1 liters per 100 km (US 46.1 mpg). Keep in mind we did this with a car that only had 12 kilometers (7 miles) on the tachometer at the start of the test drive, so these numbers are bound to improve once the car is thoroughly broken in. We should also add the fact that our test car was fitted with some Cee'd-exclusive (as far as we know) "green" tires from Michelin, with low rolling resistance.
FEED ME LIES (COMFORT) 6/10
Just like our previous Kia Cee'd test drive, the car we got to drive wasn't the best-equipped in the range, so keep in mind we're only going to talk about a medium-specced model. For starters, we didn't exactly enjoy the fabric trim on the seats, since it was quite on the cheap side.
Second of all, although the center console, the steering wheel and even the gear shift lever have been either revamped or completely replaced, the hard plastics on the interior door panels remained, also giving somewhat of a cheap feeling.
Other than that, the usual pleasant surprises remained the same as on the non-facelift Cee'd: gigantic interior space (for a car in this segment, naturally) and perfectly tuned suspension. We have to add the fact that the suspension wasn't identical, but actually a bit better from both the comfort and dynamics involved in driving.
The "see-saw" movements we experienced with the older Cee'd were completely gone while doing higher speeds, thanks to an even more sport-oriented tuning of the suspension. Oddly, the comfort felt when driving over rough pavements was kept the same, or even slightly improved, thanks to the new gas-shocks.
DEUS EX MACHINA (TECH FACTS) 5/10
Unlike the 1.6-liter we experienced in our previous Kia Cee'd, we now had a much less powerful 1.4-liter four-cylinder mill at our disposal. Since this may seem like a step backwards, from a number of reasons, we'll have to set some things right from the start.
OK, so we're talking about the newest version of Kia's 1.4-liter mill, also equipped with Continuous Variable Valve Timing and 16 valves. Compared to its first iteration on the Cee'd, it now offers 19 horsepower less, while the torque figures remain the same. Why would Kia de-tune it, you ask? Well, we did too, and the answer makes pretty good sense.
First of all, despite having a rather good horsepower/displacement ratio, all those 109 ponies weren't available until quite high on the rev band. This may not be a downside when talking about a track-focused sports car, but remember we're talking about a family grocery-getter here.
Second of all, all that top end horsepower didn't help the fuel economy one bit, on the contrary. The new version of the engine not only has a dialed back horsepower, but also a totally different torque curve, therefore actually improving the engine in two areas: fuel economy and performance during city, low-rev driving.
The multi-link rear suspension, apart from not exactly being common in this segment, has now been improved with the addition of gas shocks. This translates into better control and a much better compromise between sportiness and comfort, making the Cee'd receive marks at least as good as the Volkswagen Golf, which is no mean feat for a Korean manufacturer that's far from being as established as the segment leader in Europe.
USEFUL TOYS (GADGETS) 5/10
Earlier on we mentioned the fact that the Cee'd's interior doesn't feature THAT much of a difference compared to the old one, but we were talking mostly about the design. Although we still didn't get to drive a fully-decked model, our test car had a level of equipment similar to the non-facelift we drove before.
The headlights weren't equipped with xenon, but the facelift does bring some improvements to the standard halogen ones, which now have a magnifying glass. The windshield wipers still don't have an automatic rain sensor, while the headlights have to do without a light sensor as well. For a car costing around 13,000 euros, nobody is complaining, especially since the standard features are more than plenty for this level of equipment.
Sure, the seats are manually adjustable, but there are four electrically-operated windows with an automatic function. The seats weren't heated, but there was a dual-zone climate control system, unlike the single-zone which was available before.
The inboard-built radio CD-player has different buttons now, but it still has MP3 capabilities and an RDS radio with up to six preset stations. Both the AUX and the USB inputs are still tucked in at the base of the center console, making music pirates or iPod lovers happy everywhere.
ON THE SAFE SIDE (SAFETY) 8/10
The Cee'd was crash tested by the European NCAP organization almost two years ago, and as we were mentioning in our last Cee'd test drive, it received five full stars and a percentage to make some European brands envious. We're now talking about a facelift model, but underneath all the body panels everything is almost the same, or absolutely the same when it comes to safety.
So, it's the same stable upon impact passenger safety cell and the number of available airbags has remained the same: two dual-stage front airbags, two front side (and two rear side airbags as an option) and two head airbags that can offer protection to all outboard passengers.
Other than that, out test car was also equipped in standard with an anti-lock braking system and an electronic stability program which could be switched off from a button. All in all, the standard safety equipment is very good for this category of price.
Still, considering EuroNCAP has revised its crash testing procedures as of 2009, we don't know if a re-testing session would bring the Cee'd five whole stars again, since the ESP is standard only on some trim levels. As far as we're concerned, our test car had it in standard, so our marks are as high as on the old one in this chapter.
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY (CONCLUSIONS) 7/10
In our test drive with the previous version of the Cee'd we were praising how good the whole package was and the fact that it had managed to actually become a success story. Probably the first success story of a Korean car in the good ol' European continent, if we may say so. The problem then was the fact that it didn't quite rise up to completely beat Volkswagen Golf's supremacy in the segment. Now we can reveal the fact that the Cee'd facelift is closer to the Golf than ever before, especially considering it's keeping the same dumping price, the industry-leading 7-year warranty and the spacious (and now updated) interior.
Last time we didn't like the noisy and pretty lifeless 1.6-liter engine. This time around, with no less than 32 horsepower LESS, we actually enjoyed the 1.4-liter four banger under the hood, as long as we kept it in the city. No, this time we actually didn't quite dig some parts of the design, mainly the front grill. Not to say that it's a general opinion here, but most of us think the chrome strip around the grill actually cheapens the car instead of making it look more upscale.
The ugly bit about the Cee'd 1.4 facelift is probably the fact that you can mainly enjoy it in the city, since the 90 horsepower mill isn't enough to fully unleash the car on the highway or during a more... dynamic drive. Too bad, since the updated suspension actually gives you more confidence in pushing the car closer to its limits.
GUEST STAR EDITORS' OPINIONS AND RATINGS
![]() | Sir May B. Bach strongly believes this car is worthy of a rating of 2 / 10 "You know, I sometimes get the feeling you guys have a very... ahem... odd sense of humor. From time to time, immediately after you put me in a 100+ grand Porsche sedan you make me drive a sub-15 grand... ahem... Korean substitute of a car. It's like eating the brain of a live monkey one day and... ahem... fish'n'chips from a garbage can the next." Read more >> |
![]() | Lou Cheeka knocked, knocked some more and finally shouted a rating of 6 / 10 "Heey... I remember the Kia Cee'd. Didn't we test a similar one a few months back? I don't remember if I liked it or not, but I can surely say this one is a looker. Those squinty headlights look like a Geisha's eyes, nice! Oh and did you notice the chrome strip on the front grill? Bling-bling!" Read more >> |
![]() | Mary broke a nail, complained a bit and then gave a rating of 8 / 10 "OK, last time I learned that Kia is NOT a Japanese watchmaker, nor a sports apparel brand. I also became acquainted with the fact that Koreans aren't just awesome World of Warcraft players, but they also make pretty good cars (yes, I have a kid brother who's a WoW fanatic)." Read more >> |











08.12.2009 | 17:05 GMT
I didn't liked the first one and i stil have the same perception about korean cars, especialy about Cee'd, wich sems to be much closer from the chinese cars than the european ones.
The 90bhp from a 1.4l!? is closer to the last generations of german cars and the absence of petrol-turbo engines, send this car back to the 90's. It has to past a few more years until a Kia will be comparable with european and japanese cars.
15.12.2009 | 13:00 GMT
Mice car Kia made. The original Ce'ed was, and still is a magnificent piece of kit, and the things that it brought for that price really made this car to be a top car in it's class. However, the face lift model, in my opinion looks... like a Ford. And thats how the whole..originality of the car... disappears. I mean...i like the whole brand identity and all that, but still...i do not like my car to look like a... Ford, right? Thats why i buy a Kia.
16.12.2009 | 10:07 GMT
I've found the reviews to be very biased, the Kia Ceed, especially in the sport wagon/combi/touring version, still tops the list for european family car, simply the best value for ~?11k. You can't get similar package from other brands for this kind of money. And what sealed the deal for me was the introduction of new stop&start ISG system, now available with the facelifted version even with the smallest engine option. I see this car as the best compromise of interior space/cargo, eco footprint, exterior design, and price.
16.12.2009 | 15:10 GMT
Great
21.12.2009 | 19:11 GMT
I would like to know more about the ceed Diesel 1.6 113 Bhp is it quieter that the other Diesel engine .
Which is best option the new 1.4 with the lowered Bhp Engine or the 1.6 Diesel 113 Bhp Engine.
26.12.2009 | 02:07 GMT
well..? fair price, fair (but little bit disappointed) performence. What else we can say anything more? However, I don't think driving this car is really matter with odd sence of humer lol.
04.01.2010 | 09:29 GMT
verry nice............sooo goooood...............
09.01.2010 | 10:03 GMT
Just bought a 1.4 basic spec model for getting to work ... for the money, cannot be beaten - especially when it has a seven (yes,7) year warranty! OK, the fit and finish is not up to maybe Ford Focus but its not too far behind and don't forget it is designed and built in Europe - not the Far East. Overall, a great car for a good price ... if it had Ford or a GM badge people might be shouting about it!
10.02.2010 | 07:42 GMT
Extra car!
21.02.2010 | 17:24 GMT
A very good car .
27.02.2010 | 19:36 GMT
I like the design of this car. I think it is very good for the price.
Well, as Sir May B. Bach says, it may be like eating fish and chips from a garbage can after driving a $100k Porsche?
BUT? lets see how well Porsche can design and build a car for less than $15,000. If the previous Cayenne is anything to go by it may be pretty darn ugly!
04.03.2010 | 22:35 GMT
superb car!! a good all rounder, i would definitely recommend it!!
19.05.2010 | 14:57 GMT
great car!
27.05.2010 | 18:23 GMT
Nice, good and afordable car for peaple who mostly driving in the city
29.06.2010 | 19:04 GMT
Please I need answer, I have Kia pro ceed 3 door with 90 hp but I wan a upgrade to 109 hp, please tel me your opinion is it good idea and I don't care about warranty.
Desperately waiting on your answer, I just need to now that engine will be same and will not make problem, fuel consumption is slightly bigger but I dot care to much about 2 l in 100km
Vinko
18.08.2010 | 17:45 GMT
Brought a new kia ceed 1400 cc a month ago .Called out RAC as the car wouldn`t start, apparently the car does not recognise the key sometimes Its been back to the the place where I bought it from twice now as the first time they could not find a problem.Hope they can fix it this time as its a nice car to drive when it goes