I Want to Drive!... Even if my financial situation is a bit far from tying up with that of my colleague Bach, you probably already know I'm not actually poor either. And that's just to be modest. Yet, I don't like helicopters and I only use planes if I really have to. I'm a fan (age ... Continue reading >
LATEST LOG ENTRIES:
- MERCEDES BENZ 190 (W201)
- FIAT Stilo 5 Doors
- IVECO Eurocargo 4X4
- APRILIA 850 Mana
- MAZDA 3 / Axela Sedan
QUICK STATS:
Test Drive: DACIA Sandero Stepway 1.6 MPI - 2009
- PHOTO GALLERY
- INTRO / HISTORY / BRAND
- EXTERIOR
- INTERIOR
- IN THE CITY
- OPEN ROAD
- COMFORT
- TECH FACTS
- GADGETS
- SAFETY
- CONCLUSIONS
- GUEST EDITOR OPINIONS
INTRO / HISTORY / BRAND 5/10
A few months back we got the chance to test one of the cheapest hatchbacks on the planet, the Dacia Sandero. With a somewhat odd styling for a modern car and some pretty beefed up (height wise) suspension, the little Sandero fared pretty well for a car costing as much as a feature on a luxury car.
Its only major flaws were the lack of modern options and an engine and gearbox with 1980's technology, but other than those and the somewhat passe styling, the Sandero scored a decent amount of points. In the mean time, first rumors and then spyshots continued to pour in about a compact SUV that Dacia will unveil in the following year.
Probably thinking it might as well offer its customers a preview of what it's like to drive a Dacia compact SUV, they decided to first unveil a modified Sandero. By "modified" we don't necessarily mean a prequel to the Dacia SUV, but a more rugged-looking Sandero, with a design closer to a compact crossover/SUV than a hatchback.
Compared to the regular Sandero, the Stepway is almost two centimeters (about an inch) higher - by way of a suspension with increased travel – and has a body kit that makes the car look ready to tackle the Baja 1000. OK, we kid about the last bit, but it sure does look off-road ready, doesn't it?
We got the chance to spend some time behind the wheel of a Sandero Stepway 1.6 MPI, so in most of the chapters - if not all – we will compare it with the Sandero 1.6 MPI we tested earlier. Some may call the Stepway just another trim level on the Sandero, while others see a new model. Considering the technical differences are pretty big between the two, we'll consider it a new model just in the same way we consider the Subaru Outback a different car compared to a Legacy Wagon.
VISUAL IMPACT (EXTERIOR) 5/10
The rugged-looking bodykit is the first thing you notice when seeing a Sandero Stepway. Too bad pretty much all of the silver inserts all around the car are made of plastic and make absolutely no difference in the car's off-roading ability. The increased ground clearance is the second thing you notice different about the car compared to the Sandero, and this bit actually makes a lot of difference in its off-roading capability.
Read more >>
On the whole, the plastic silver bodykit practically transforms the car from looking like an average East-European econobox to a pretty cool crossover(ish) vehicle, especially since the ground clearance is almost as high as on some other modern compact crossovers. And plus, who's going to know that you're not actually sporting an all-wheel drive transmission, while the tires with high side walls were equipped for cost-cutting measures and not off-road activity?
Besides the aforementioned differences in design, the silver lining which used to adorn the exterior of the headlights is now black on the Stepway, giving it sort of a "grim" look, like the car is angry about something. Differently-designed alloy wheels are also present on the car, although still only in 15-inch guise, while the exhaust pipe now sports a chrome tip.
Oddly, when the Stepway was first launched, 16-inch alloy wheels seemed to be present as standard on it, but the car would have prpobably accelerated even slower with those on. Anyway, other than the said differences, the car is obviously identical to the normal Sandero, so every body panel is the same. Nevertheless, the overall impression thanks to the rugged bodykit and the increased height is that of the best-looking Dacia ever, as lame as that may sound.
DEEP IMPACT (INTERIOR) 3/10
Unfortunately, the Sandero Stepway's interior is available in a single trim level, and it's not exactly the cheeriest one Dacia designers could find. Obviously, the design of every button and every knob is identical to the one from the regular Sandero and the Logan/Logan MCV. The only thing setting the Stepway apart from those is the darker color for the "aluminium" plastic inserts on the center console.
Other than that, nothing. There is a "Stepway" sticker on the door sills but you can only see that while the door is open, naturally. The interior gives you almost no clue you're in a different model than the ones mentioned above. Same cheap but sturdy plastic, same poor ergonomics, but there's also a twist.
This is the first new car we drove this year that didn't have all the windows electrically-operated, since the ones from the rear doors are manual. Plus, as a "Stepway special", the mirrors aren't electrically operated either, not even on the options list. But wait, there's more! The Stepway doesn't have an onboard computer. Yes, you've read that correctly, if you want to know how much gas you're using you have to do it the old-fashion way – after each trip to the pump.
Other than the small "glitches" mentioned above, there is also a Stepway-only new upholstery, but it somewhat fails to cheer up everyone inside. As for the interior space, everything is absolutely identical to the Sandero. In other words, four or even five adults can be seated just fine inside for shorter trips, while the 340-liters (11.3 cubic feet) of luggage space are way above the class average. On the whole, for a car costing less than 10,000 euros the interior quality is somewhat acceptable, while the space available is more than you would otherwise bargain for.
IN THE CITY 3/10
Since all the passengers, including the driver, are sitting at an SUV-like height, the overall visibility in the Dacia Sandero Stepway is quite a good step above your average subcompact hatchback. Did we say "step"? More like an entire ladder. To put things into perspective, the regular Dacia Sandero sits high enough for a car in its class, with a ground clearance of 16.5 centimeters (6.5 inches). If you think that's high, learn that the Sandero Stepway has no less than 18 centimeters (7.1 inches) of ground clearance. That's as high as some crossover/SUVs out there.
Read more >>
So, in short, the Stepway's main benefit over the regular Sandero in the city is the increased ground clearance, which translates into an SUV-like visibility. That and the fact that the comfort over speed bumps and over optimistic roadside curbs is at a much higher level. Considering a few months back we tested a regular Sandero, which came equipped with the same 1.6-liter engine, it will be easier to give an objective opinion about the Sandero Stepway 1.6 MPI.
To be frank, the ancient four-cylinder under the Stepway's hood left us with an even worse impression than the one in the regular Sandero we tested before. In theory, it's the same car, the same engine and the same gearbox, but in practice the Stepway is a much worse candidate for this technical package. Speaking of which, this also translates into a fuel consumption even higher than that on the normal Sandero.
Since our test car was not equipped (not even optionally!) with an onboard computer, we had to calculate the mileage ourselves, the old-fashioned way. We achieved a figure close 11.5-12 liters per 100 kilometers (US 19.6-20.4 mpg) in strictly busy city driving, which is quite a bit higher than the advertised 10.2 liters per 100 kilometers (US 23.1 mpg).
That's not bad but it's not super great either, especially when thinking this is a 1.6-liter engine after all and the Stepway isn't exactly a juggernaut at a little under 1200 kilograms (2645 pounds). Apart from the rather high fuel consumption, we didn't find many downsides with this engine option on the Stepway for the city. Considering it has a pretty good torque curve, it offers pleasurable driving despite its low power. All in all, if you're going exclusively for fuel economy you might be better off with the lower-powered 1.5 dCi version.
OPEN ROAD 4/10
Until the Kanjara/Duster compact SUV hits the markets in 2010, the Sandero Stepway is the closest thing to a four-by-four in the current Dacia model line-up. Without having an all-wheel drive system – albeit it sure looks like a small SUV – the Stepway can really hold its own on more-than-rough roads. We're talking cross-country mountain roads with huge potholes, where a high ground clearance is vital.
Read more >>
As we mentioned before, the Stepway sports no less than 18 centimeters (7.1 inches) of ground clearance, more than enough to tackle quite a good number of poor roads without any major sweat. To really put it to the test we took our car through a mountain road where the only other vehicle we met was a modified Suzuki Jimny with lifted suspension and all-terrain tires.
The Stepway proved to be a very good companion in this situation, but the lack of all-wheel drive, some proper off-road tires and, of course, decency, stopped us from climbing all the way to the top of the mountain. All in all, the Stepway's destiny as a road trip car is to tackle some of the poorest roads in the world.
On a nice, pothole-free road though – such as, let's say, a highway – the best addition to the Stepway (the high ground clearance, ed) is transforming into its enemy. The regular Sandero we tested before also had a mildly high suspension setup, but it was much more adequate at high speeds or during "dynamic" driving. To put it shortly, the Stepway's SUV-like height is doing nothing but hurt its medium-to-high speeds capabilities.
The JH five speed gearbox is probably the least fortunate piece of technology to make its way on the Sandero 1.6 MPI. The thing is, this isn't such a terrible transmission, it's just that its ratios are too long, especially for an engine as "powerful" as this. Another downside is probably the fact that the gearshifts aren't the most precise in the world and you might find yourself missing third from time to time.
As for the other dynamic qualities, the 12.4 seconds from naught to 100 km/h (62 mph) feel like forever, especially when even the non-Stepway Sandero achieved a time of 11.5 seconds. That one felt slower than that in reality as well, so you can imagine how a time of almost a second more felt. Also, probably "thanks" to a drag coefficient of 0.39 and about a hundred kilograms of extra weight, the top speed dropped from 174 kilometers per hour to a rather shabby 163 km/h (from 108 mph to 101 mph).
All in all the Sandero Stepway is MUCH better than the regular Sandero on poor roads, but it's also infinitely worse on smooth surfaces, "thanks" not only to the raised suspension but to the poorer aerodynamics and the extra weight.
FEED ME LIES (COMFORT) 4/10
Just like the normal Sandero we tested earlier, the Sandero Stepway we drove came equipped with the best trim level available. There is a problem with this fact, though. You see, unlike the regular Sandero, the Stepway doesn't have a "Prestige" trim level. It only has one trim level as a matter of fact, and it is a bit basic, to say the least.
Read more >>
For one thing, there are no electrically-operated rear view mirrors. And we really mean there aren't any. Not even optional. In other words, if you want to change the way the rearview mirror on the right is positioned you have to either lean over the front passenger or have orangutan hands. Not a very comfortable choice either way.
Getting to the other comfort areas, the Stepway actually feels like a totally different car compared to the normal Sandero. The raised suspension can practically soak in everything you throw at it: every speed bump, every tram line or every pothole, without even reducing your speed. Obviously, the 15-inch tires with rather high side walls play a pretty important role in this equation but most of the work is handled by the increased suspension travel. So, only top marks in this area.
Even though the trim level was pretty basic, as we said, the interior on our test car wasn't exactly identical to a lower-spec Sandero/Logan. We say this because the color of the "aluminium" plastic inserts in the interior was darker than in any other Dacia, be it the Logan, the Logan MCV or the normal Sandero. Everything else is absolutely identical, so the comfort marks will also be similar.
DEUS EX MACHINA (TECH FACTS) 3/10
You'll have to admit that only 90 horsepower and 128 Nm (94.4 lb ft) of torque are underachieving figures from a modern 1.6-liter gasoline engine. Well, the thing is that the engine found under the hood of the Dacia Sandero Stepway we tested is as far from modern as saying "neat" instead of "cool" or "awesome". Identical to the one from the Sandero 1.6 MPI we drove before, it managed to provide even less impressive figures, both from the performance or the fuel economy point of view.
The antique two valves per cylinder arrangement and the multipoint indirect injection manage to "steal" pretty much from the engine's potential. To give you guys an idea of how old this engine's conception is, you should just learn that it was introduced for the first time in this form in the early nineties, on the first generation of the Renault Megane.
To put it in short, the engine is the least powerful 1.6-liter in its class, while the fuel economy it provides is mighty far from being efficient, especially on a car such as the Sandero Stepway. As we mentioned in the regular Sandero 1.6 MPI test drive, we did like its power and torque curves, which are pretty flat, therefore making it pretty OK for city driving since you don't have to change gears so often.
Naturally, the lack of oomph at higher rpm is present on the Stepway as well, while the Renault-sourced JH five-speed transmission is as imprecise as on the regular Sandero. Also, another problem with the gearbox is the way you put it into reverse. There was more than one occasion when we got it into fourth instead of reverse, since they are so close together. Other than that, every technical bit is identical with the ones found on the normal Sandero, except for the McPherson suspension, which has a longer travel.
USEFUL TOYS (GADGETS) 2/10
If you thought the Sandero or the Logan have basic equipment, wait till you hear about the Stepway. Probably in an effort to keep the overall costs under control, Dacia decided to only invest in an updated look for the exterior. Not only did the interior not get any major upgrade, it even has LESS equipment than the most basic Sandero.
For starters, the car only has front electrically actuated windows, while the rear passengers have to do with manual ones. Do you think that's bad? The Sandero Stepway we drove was also equipped with manually-operated rear view mirrors, making it impossible for the driver to adjust the mirror from the right during driving.
OK, so the gadgets are even more limited than in its "non-Stepway" brothers, but there was another accessory which probably shouldn't even miss from the cheapest car there is. We're talking about the onboard computer, which isn't available even as an option, at least for the time being.
It's actually pretty annoying to calculate the fuel consumption only by going to the petrol station and refueling. Apart from the Blaupunkt rather basic MP3 CD-player model and the manual air conditioning unit we couldn't find a single other "gadget" worth mentioning, making the Stepway the least equipped modern car we drove these past few years.
ON THE SAFE SIDE (SAFETY) 4/10
Since the Stepway is not only based on the same platform, but is actually the same car as the regular Sandero - sitting on a higher ground clearance and with slightly more weight - we will just refer to the Sandero test drive for the safety bit.
As we mentioned before, the model was tested twice by the EuroNCAP organization because it is available with two "safety packs". The first one received only three stars out of five, mainly because it wasn't even fitted with side protection airbags, while the second one got four stars.
The "fully loaded" safety pack gets thorax and head-protecting airbags for the front passengers, among the other minimum active and passive safety features, such as the Bosch 8.1 anti-lock braking system, the emergency brake assist system, the two frontal airbags and the front seatbelt pretentioners with load limiters.
Our test car was equipped with the second safety pack, thus including the side-bags, making us guess that it would also receive four stars at the EuroNCAP (as safe as the normal Sandero). All in all, the Stepway has approximately 100 extra kilograms (220 pounds) over its little brother, so we can assume it would fare a little better in an accident. Then again, the car is also taller, thus more likely to spin off the road...
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY (CONCLUSIONS) 5/10
Obviously, the biggest advantage of the Sandero Stepway over its little brother resides in its ability to go where no other Dacia has ever gone before. The gigantic (for a small car such as this) ground clearance and the suspension's travel level almost any pothole or road imperfection, making it the perfect car for a beginner driver. Wherever there's a road, the Stepway can drive over it, no matter how bad it is. Of course, the lack of an all-wheel drive system should keep you away from the off-road course, but the ground clearance and the short overhangs are almost trail ready.
We kind of struggled to find a really bad point in the Stepway, not because it doesn't have any but because they were too many. In the end we agreed about the lack of basic features. No electrically-actuated side mirrors or rear windows and no onboard computer for the fuel consumption. These might seem to be minor glitches for a car costing under ten thousand euros but they've pretty transformed from gadgets to necessity in recent times (circa 1980s).
The ugly bit about the Sandero Stepway we tested is most likely the engine and gearbox combo. The engine lacks a lot of power and is not quite fuel efficient while the gearbox had a pretty hard way of selecting reverse. Also, since it's not synchronized it has a very "rubbery" feel when changing gears. A new, more powerful and more efficient engine choice in the future would most likely erase this "ugly part" from our test drive.
GUEST STAR EDITORS' OPINIONS AND RATINGS
![]() | Sir May B. Bach strongly believes this car is worthy of a rating of 1 / 10 "I know, I promised myself I would never... ahem... ever climb in a Dacia again. After I drove that... ahem... Ecto 1... or Logan MCV... whatever it's called, I had to take a two weeks leave from running my self-made empire because I had to puke all day and all night. After riding in the horrifying Sandero I became... ahem... chronically depressed. Now you guys made me drive another atrocity by Dacia... the Sandero Stepway." Read more >> |
![]() | Mary broke a nail, complained a bit and then gave a rating of 8 / 10 "You know, I've been wondering for quite some time now what is the cheapest Sport Utility Vehicle in the world. When I first saw the Dacia Sandero Stepway and read the price sheet I thought I had finally gotten my answer, only to be immediately contradicted by the rest of the guys. " Read more >> |
![]() | Lou Cheeka knocked, knocked some more and finally shouted a rating of 9 / 10 "This is just the kind of car I need in order for my neighbors to "howdy!" me every time they see me. It looks almost as "butch" and intimidating as an 'merican truck, though at only a quarter of the price and about 1/8 of the size. The fuel consumption is not much better though, I would have rather tested the dCi model if I would have been you guys." Read more >> |
![]() | Charles Darveight pondered gravely, nearly fell asleep and then submitted a rating of 2 / 10 "Although I'm a fan of Sir May B Bach, I hate his stupid habit of carrying at least a pair of extremely weird and expensive dogs with him all the time. And you know what? What I hate even more is the fact that these poop-making machines have to follow him everywhere: inside people's homes, in cars, on boats (which already cost a fortune), etc." Read more >> |











08.11.2009 | 10:53 GMT
Cannot rate without driving it. I would like to see the Renault 16TS of the 70's re-introduced as a comfortable sporty low cost executive Dacia with personality! It also had speed, high ground clearance, reasonable economy. I travelled 1000's of kilometres in one in South Africa. It also would go almost anywhere. Think about it ! Best Regards to a future major value brand, Jeff
10.11.2009 | 20:47 GMT
Ugly car, but very cheap.
If you need a car and you don't have a lot of money, but you want it new, Sandero can be a choice.
The next Dacia model it will be a SUV powered by an 90hp diesel engine.. oh, joy!
10.11.2009 | 20:51 GMT
You coky bunch of screwups, you wouldn't know what a car is even if it would hit you right in your face. Tell me when other car manufacturer will make a CAR (just engine,4wheels and an adequat interior for countryside work and other dirty activities) at such a low price and such a good quality. THE ANSWER IS NEVER.
11.11.2009 | 21:20 GMT
A good car for Romanians, and very good for Romanian roads .
12.11.2009 | 11:30 GMT
@Alejandro
Yes, it'a a cheap car, but they really want it to FEEL cheap!
That is the problem...
13.11.2009 | 21:58 GMT
when you are driving this car it is a good car everything is going well whem driving it i had tried it en i buy one it is a great car
18.11.2009 | 14:27 GMT
For its purpose, it's magnificent. If you want to make your neighbor jealous, well you are not Sandero's target