BMW X3 3.0sd Test Drive

Our test car: BMW X3 3.0sd (E83)
65 / 100
#

December 5th, 2008

users' rating

50 / 100


13 votes total
rate this car: 1/100


I. History
BMW X3 3.0sd  - History

I. History

6 / 10
share:      
text size: A- A+
For a volume-seller, when it was launched in 2004, the BMW X3 probably got off to the worst start for a Bavarian model in the last 50 years. Almost every automotive magazine editor complained about the car in one way or another. First, being just slightly smaller than the first generation X5, people were expecting the same range of options that were on its larger brother. They didn't get them. The X3 didn't even have “Angel Eyes” daytime running lights, which is a real turn-off if you're a BMW fan.

The rather small option list wasn't the only thing that bugged people about it. Most of them complained about not being able to classify the X3. It wasn't a sporty and luxurious SUV (OK, OK, SAV) like the X5, but it wasn't a jacked-up 3 Series Touring with all-wheel-drive either, even though most of the mechanicals of the X3 are shared with the E46 3 Series. OK, so it wasn't very good in off-road territory but it didn't excel on the road either. Some people called it one of the ugliest BMWs ever (and were probably right if you ask some of us) so as a first wrap-up we could all say that BMW didn't played its cards right with the X3.

Well, time proved almost every automotive journalist wrong and the X3 even began outselling much cheaper compact SUVs such as the Toyota RAV4, with over 100.000 units sold each year. X3's success convinced even arch-rivals from Audi and Mercedes-Benz, who took turns in launching their own competitors in this segment. As time passed, BMW realized it had to keep its small(ish) crossover SUV updated, therefore the Bavarian engineers were put to work for the facelift model. Among the changes suffered in 2007 was the upgraded options list, which now includes the long waited for “Angel Eyes” and a new range of engines. The model we tested is the top-of-the-range 3.0sd, almost fully equipped and also having the Motorsport package.

table of contents:

  your opinion about this car

send
comment
97,458 hits · Share · Send via email · Print

comments written so far

On 15 December 2008 at 17:23 UTC, decay said:
I also am lucky enough to own a 3.0SD, I have been driving it for the past year and how the time has just flown past. I could not resist the urge to chip the engine the day it arrived. ?100 on ebay buys you a little box that overrides the high pressure fuel bar sensor, a little screw on the box allows you to adjust/boost the pressure leading to more fueling and greater power.
I also purchased a Gtech performance meter to see what the car was doing before and after....

before
standing 1/4 14.6 @ 98.3mph
0-60 6.7 secs
222hp at wheels

after
standing 1/4 13.3 @ 102.9mph
0-60 5.3 secs
273hp at wheels

be my reckoning that's about 350 at the crank (64 BHP for ?100!). The G-tech could not measure the torque correctly as it required a ignition rpm pulse but being a diesel it failed to find one. Anyone sitting in the car will tell you it has plenty of torque.

Despite the acceleration gains this car does appear to have a speed limiter set at 148MPH, I tried in vain late one night on a local piece of very wide new motorway. There is a good big hill which I had to drive up first then turn around and come back down. So it went up the hill at 148mph and back down again at 148mph.... showing 155mph on the dials and 148 on my Nokia N95 GPS. I am quite sure it would go faster... the steering gets a bit flighty above 140, not recommended for busy roads!

Just to hack you off a bit more I average 27mpg and that is mainly very short distance work 3-4 miles (and I do put my foot down, a lot) If pushed I can still see 40mpg but that's no fun.

Its a great (ugly) little flyer without the chip, but with it its enough to upset many a sports car owner.

I still find it amazing that BMW USA don't import this model, is it the same corporate short sightedness that lead to the collapse of the car industry?
On 29 May 2009 at 23:09 UTC, Ted Knorring said:
I can't wait for the new diesel version of my little Panzer. My 2007 X3 3.0si is great in the snow and better on the highway, but I'm looking forward to even better fuel economy on my next BMW.
After 30 months, it is still my favorite car , except for my old 911 Porsche.

On 17 September 2009 at 04:57 UTC, X3ABSURD said:
To car reviewers everywhere. Kindly GET REAL.

Even in the latest 2009 model the bone-jarring, perennially bouncing, bouncing ride is HORRIBLE. It pitches one way and then another and then back. It does this, not over rough roads or cobbles but over flat roads with barely a perceptible indentation.

This is an absurd vehicle. Why would anyone produce a hauler like this with a ride like this? Things not tied or belted down or contained in some manner go airborne and not during high speed maneuvers or while drag racing down some back alley. They do this when pulling out of a parking space and accelerating to an entire 20 mph down a paved street.

What in the world?

BE REAL. Prevent the hype and the ads and the financing deals from overshadowing actual driving experience. Words like concussive, clinically insane, green gills get lost in the peppy HP and BMW badge talk. In the real world, one can develop a serious case of anger when faced with the prospect of several years of bounce-bounce-bounce-bounce for no apparent reason.

This vehicle is absurd. Can I give it a negative number as a rating? It should go back to the shop, oh that's right it is already in the shop, and stay until it learns how to ride without bouncing its occupants on flat roads.

On 19 September 2009 at 11:03 UTC, Entoxicum said:
Not very bad, but still a BMW. Not for me...
On 7 October 2009 at 02:40 UTC, Bogdan said:
@X3ABSURD

X3, a bouncy car?
You are kidding, right?

Did you try an air suspension to see what bouncy means?

The problem is that the X3's suspension is very stiff and this is a problem on bad roads and on long trips.
On 17 November 2009 at 18:26 UTC, X3ABSURD said:
Yes, the X3 is a super bouncy car. I am not talking about a firm and sporty suspension. I am talking about a bounciness that is so bad a person can (and has) actually gotten seasick. That isn't even a passenger...that is the driver.

I am not talking about going over railroad tracks and feeling concussions up the spine. I am talking about going over minor mole hills and small valleys in paved roads at low speed. It feels as if the top part of the car is bouncing on springs while the tires stay on the road. You have to work at staying down in your seat.

It is really uncomfortable and probably is one major reason that lots of people dislike this car. It is intermittent so potential buyers may not feel this in a test drive. It is not as noticeable if you have a lead foot or do mostly highway driving. People may chalk this up to the road but from what I see it is the car.

I have driven several other BMWs over the same roads and did not end up with such a driving experience. What is wrong with the X3???????

What is going on with this suspension??????

Fixes anyone? Is it not fixable?

On 25 November 2009 at 16:01 UTC, GODD said:
@X3ABSURD : Sorry to say this, but you know nothing about cars in general. From what you say, this is the only logical conlcusion I can reach.
On 14 April 2010 at 09:24 UTC, joe said:
suspension is hard but it feels like when you used std.car and you try to find sport suspension put in to it.

Some body like it but some do not

for me i feel do not understand why BMW make the car like this for markets.

But I am very happy with sport suspension that BMW gaves me for free.

On 4 July 2010 at 08:23 UTC, king julien said:
this car is beautiful
On 4 December 2010 at 22:33 UTC, CarFanatic59 said:
I enjoy my X3, i love it and i don't find the suspension a big problem. It's not like you're going to go 100mph off roading, thats just crazy...

But i still love it compared to my other cars i had in my life time