Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked: Part 1

share:      
text size: A- A+
This week's coverstory deals with the somewhat funny matter of motorcycle myths we bikers confront on an almost daily basis; while some are truly amusing, others are simply the result of prejudice and can sometimes trigger unwanted results.

Like with anything just a tad less ordinary than what a casual guy would meet on a casual day, the motorcycling world has long time been associated with several ideas that have more or less support in real life. Some of these myths have their origin in the non-motorcycle world; others are sadly believed by some bikers, mostly inexperienced ones or guys who tend to trust appealing stories they hear here and there, but skipping the preliminary judgment stage.

Riding a motorcycle will end in severe injuries or death

“You'll get badly hurt or even killed riding that motorbike” is possibly the thing you'll hear most often. Indeed, there's most likely no rider on this planet who hasn't heard this line; but behind such dramatic prophecies lies a lot of truth.

If we take a closer look at the accidents involving motorcycles, we'll see that most of the bad cases end in gruesome displays of mutilated bodies scattered across highways or splashed against incoming vehicles.

Nevertheless, this isn't what motorcycling is about; the fact that bike accidents scenes tend to look fiercer doesn't mean by any chance that there is a causal relationship between these two things. We are more impressed at the scene of a bike crash just because the poor rider was thrown off the bike through the air, landing meters away from the impact place, breaking limbs or worse.

When you see two cars that have crashed one into the other, it's most likely that you could not tell what's on the inside, despite the bitter truth that sometimes the sight is at least as gruesome as the scene of a bad motorcycle crash.
Truth is that riding a bike involves a lot more danger than driving your car. First of all, it's rather hard to fall from your car; there are of course cases of drivers of unimaginable stupidity who have gotten thrown out of their cars in almost “mild” scenarios, but they are the very exception. When on a bike, the rider can get hurt easily when losing control due to sand and dirt on the road, excessive or insufficient leaning in a turn and so on.

Even more, when a fellow-driver fails to give way or notice the incoming bike and it crashes into the car, the absence of a metal frame or similar body parts exposes the rider to the obstacles or road a lot more.

But again, all of the above have absolutely no influence when it comes to counting the motorcycle accidents. Bikes have no "cursed" tendency to crash, and that's a fact. Now, riders being more exposed to danger and keeping in mind that many mistakes one can make while riding a motorbike are often not “forgiven”, that's a different story. Learning how to ride, turn and brake properly, wearing suitable gear and paying a lot of attention can spare you a lot fuss.

Loud pipes save lives

This myth is originated in the very biking world and is has a lot of supporters among both riders and custom aftermarket exhaust pipes manufacturers. Basically, those who claim that loud pipes save lives assume that the louder the noise a motorcycle makes on the road, the more chances they have of being noticed by other road-colleagues and thus less likely the occurrence of an accident.

The truth behind such a claim disproves this myth on so many levels: simple, common physics, common sense or plain reason can bring in countless reasons because this is just a myth. Let's tread the path of physics a bit and analyze what's happening from a strictly mechanical point of view.

Motorcycle exhausts openings are facing towards the rear of the bike, and it's obviously to the back where the gases and all the noise are directed. Assuming that the noise a motorcycle makes travels in an omnidirectional manner is just wrong, because noise is air (or other gases, for what's worth) in movement. With the air/ gas jest directed towards the rear of the bike, it's there where all the noise goes. And if you don't believe this, just 'start your engine in the open and then check the noise levels when facing the bike and behind it, alternatively.

When riding at higher speeds, things are even worse, because you're not only remaining close to the place where all the exhaust gases start to make noise hitting the mass of air, but you're traveling further from that zone as you advance on the road.
Now, having established that pipes generate a lot more noise behind the bike than in front of it, claiming that loud(er) pipes would help getting you noticed by the man driving the car in front sounds just silly. A loud exhaust pipe could come in handy when splitting the lanes at low speed, letting the drivers in front of you know “something is approaching” and maybe preventing them from cutting you off or opening the doors. Analyzing the crash reports, statistics indicate that around 77% of the hazards come in front of the biker, and only 3% approach from behind. What's next, front-facing exhausts?

Having installed modified pipes on a bike may indeed make it sound a lot different, with a touch of more aggressive tone, and could, beyond any shadow of doubt, make the rider feel better about him/herself and his or her machinery. Cool pipes make any bike look better, there's too much truth in here to start a debate; but along with the mean looks come a lot of other things...

Common sense urges us to think about noise pollution: while a rider might believe that the new sound of the bike is the most beautiful music in the world, many others might (and will) strongly disagree. Throttling the bike at 11PM thundering down the alley will simply increase the prejudice most non-bikers have against us, the riders. For most people, this sound is as pleasant as a dumpster truck on a Sunday at 5 AM, after returning from a party and getting one hour of sleep.

Adding “it's my bike and I'll do with it as I see fit” is not helping; au contraire, it just makes a very lame excuse for making excessive noise. Owning a motorcycle does not come with the right to break the noise regulations, and even though a racing exhaust might receive clearance for installation on common bikes, this brings little comfort to the passers-by and traffic-fellows. It's just a matter of being polite and care for those around you.

Aftermarket exhausts will also increase the horsepower (both the loud and the properly muffled ones), but claiming this as the main reason for making excessive noise just doesn't cut it. With most of the motorcycles being manufactured these days already coming with more than sufficient power for pretty much any rider or road conditions, it's rather hard to believe that all that was missing was the 5 or 10 bhp increase granted by a hollow exhaust.

Finally, it's the simple fact that a louder pipe is by no means a proactive or primary safety measure, but a secondary one. Again, learning how to ride well (throttle, turn, brake and so on) and keeping a close eye to the traffic around you are essential to making it home safely.
The first rule of avoiding a crash is not placing yourself in a critical traffic situation, and this means riding carefully and being able to detect the potential hazards early. It's always easier to avoid a nasty situation than to find a safe exit from one.

Installing a better horn, wearing a bright color helmet or a high-visibility jacket/ vest are proven methods of making yourself noticed easier in traffic. Even more, these measures are most likely not to offend anyone, and the roads will be a bit safer having less annoyed, less aggressive drivers.

That's about it with the LPSL (loud pipes save lives) and the “you'll end up dead” myths; check back next week for part 2 of “Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked”.
UP NEXT: 2013 Hyundai Accent - Upgraded [Photo Gallery]    Tip: navigate with ← and →

  tell us what you think


post comment
13,017 hits · Share this story · Send via email · Print

comments written so far

On 8 June 2012 at 13:38 UTC, Gerry Alden said:
Your article is based on opinion, not science. Guess what? Science has found evidence to disclaim the .25cent helmet sticker claim. It is not a coincidence that two of the most comprehensive motorcycle accident studies (HURT Report & M.A.I.D.S.), both conclude that modified conventional motorcycles, like those with customized exhaust are over-represented in accident statistics. Therefore it is very likely that each anecdotal story of how noise was perceived to help minimize risk, can be explained away as the most important factor in accident prevention, by step-by-step defensive actions each rider could of better used to minimize risks. There is evidence to disclaim how loud pipes help create a margin of safety by science dealing with how excessive noise levels as cognitively perceived changes physiological activations. When a rider accelerates a loud bike the heart beat, and respiratory changes take place and brain chemicals flood into the mind to alter the ability to guard against dangerous situations. The noise can prevent safe riding strategies due to the changes in how the brain functions. Disruptions in physiological functions due to excessive sound energy from purposely altered noise control equipment, could explain why both accident studies agree modify motorcycles with loud exhaust are more dangerous to a rider then a standard motorcycle.
On 8 June 2012 at 15:33 UTC, Ralph Couey said:
The real proof of the LPSL myth lies in accident statistics. According to data collected by NHTSA and the insurance industry, the rate at which bikes with loud exhausts (Harleys, some sport bikes) are subject to "failure to yield" accidents is no different than any other bike.
On 8 June 2012 at 17:03 UTC, Andy Ford said:
Thank you for a sensible, informative article. The loud pipes save lives mantra is nonsense of course and this is proven by the many thousands of riders who operate quiet motorcycles every day safely. There's no question that loud colors trump loud pipes and if noise is needed for safety, there are a number of compact, very loud air horns that cost much less than illegally loud aftermarket pipes.
On 11 June 2012 at 18:54 UTC, Rob Salvv said:
Loud noise physics argument is flawed. Though most noise and all gases are directed rear ward, the echoes from other vehicles, road side furniture, the very air density change at the pipe exit, cause sound to be thrown forward. How else would those at turn 1 know a bike has turned onto the straight? How else would police down the road hear bikes at "noise" coming down the road??

//Loud noise might cause adrenal/physiological reactions - as in a fright! lol It's a crock to say that the expected loud noise causes poor rider choices - there are plenty of adrenal encouragers in normal everyday traffic - do these riders in this hyper focussed state make poor choices??

// The NHTSA stats showing no significant difference between right of way violations, aren't talking about merge SMIDSY avoided by having loud pipes. Hearing doesn't suffer from the same cognitive "blindfolds" as vision does. It's much harder to ignore an annoying noise to your rear when about to make a lane change. The cocooning in modern lounge seats on wheels has reduced this advantage somewhat.

//Of course quite bikes are ridden safely. Any correlation between loud pipes and crashes probably reflect self selection bias that it's the less conservative riders that modify their bikes. By definition then, conservative riders should appear less in the stats.

//Florin, if part two include Hi Viz reducing crashes, be very careful how you quote and or use studies. You should probably check out Dan Simon's material before taking a Hi Viz makes you safer line. Also, if ABS is in your myths, you'll show your lack of comprehension if you quote the IIHS 37% of lives saved by ABS study. Looking forward to part two.
On 16 June 2012 at 00:19 UTC, Jukka Muhonen said:
about loud pipes. when i changed my pipe to louder, motorcycle was easier to ride, i could now hear what engine does when i ride at bending roads. So i dont think that is totally false. Without that sound i have a lot bigger change to lock my backwheel at corners with engine. And when accerelating its better to hear that you really are accelerating because on motorcycles speed cant be felt that good than cars because there is no much g-forces affecting straightly to rider. I would say that voice of bike replaces g-force of car, which is important. You probably have driven some car simulators, they are hard just because you cannot feel it.
On 16 June 2012 at 07:49 UTC, sonu malik said:
wat happens wen driver press the clutch and rear brake simultaneously
On 18 June 2012 at 09:59 UTC, florin tibu said:
Sonu Malik: First of all you shouldn't be using the rear brake alone.

I believe that most riders agree that one should also pull the clutch lever while braking; at least that's how I brake especially when having to slow down from higher speeds in a short time, much like emergency braking. With the pulled clutch decoupling the engine from the wheels, the brakes have only the weight and inertia of the bike to oppose to, and not the engine inertia as well.

One should note that the engine can also help you stop: the engine brake, but using the engine brake at high speeds is not THAT effective - it use it when riding downhill at moderate speed (I really hate downhill), but I avoid using it too much. It exerts unnecessary strain on the chain and clutch. And you should remember that the bigger the engine and more compression - the more powerful the engine brake.

Other riders claim that not pulling the clutch when braking is the way to go, because the engine brake will help you stop faster, as a big engine with almost no gas would oppose to the movement of the bike.

I couldn't tell 100% sure which way is better: I prefer to pull the clutch lever; you should do dome testing for yourself, well protected and on a free road. And even having a friend or two with you, just in case.
On 20 July 2012 at 21:06 UTC, Larry Deal said:
A very good article, but it is not really necessary to try to prove the LPSL myth is just a myth and a bunch of nonsense by those who just like loud pipes. The fact is, loud pipes are illegal and they need to be removed from the loud motorcycles that assault the public with the excessive and unnecessary noise they unleash upon them. What is needed to accomplish that are laws that target the heart of the problem, those loud non-EPA compliant after market pipes. They need to go, and those laws need to be enforced to make them go away, for one thing you can count on is, the LPSL crowd is not going get rid of their loud pipes on their own. They need to be shown that the rule of law that says quite clearly ,"loud pipes are illegal", is not a myth.
On 7 August 2012 at 15:32 UTC, caddj said:
I noticed a difference in car behaviour when I used to wear a white helmet and a black jacket with yellow vest. In the mirror of a car it was hard to tell if I was a Policeman. It made a big difference .
On 11 March 2013 at 13:50 UTC, Larry R. said:
Hoooooorayyy! Thank You. I had to move because of the constant stream of over 100db noise at my door from motorcycles passing my house every ten minutes. Well said. And the actual accident stats from the authorities state that it's about 50-50... accidents with loud pipes vs. pleasant pipes. So, it makes no difference.
this is just an excuse for people to act immaturely... I say, Grow Up and take the Baseball Cards out of your spokes!

Cars we've tested recently

all testdrives

popular stories about "motorcycle myths"

Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked: Part 1

Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked: Part 1

This week's coverstory deals with the somewhat funny matter of motorcycle myths we bikers confront on an almost daily basis; while some are truly amusing, others are simply the result of prejud... Continue reading
Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked: Part 4

Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked: Part 4

Ahoy there, fellow riders and fellow readers, and welcome to the forth (and yet not the last) episode of our myth-related coverstory. After dealing with the dangers of riding and noise, laying or no... Continue reading
Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked: Part 3

Most Common Motorcycle Myths Debunked: Part 3

Hello there, fellow riders and fellow readers. Thanks for checking back with us this week for the third part of the myth-debunking endeavor we've started. The first two episodes dealt with ... Continue reading